Search for: "State v. Grays"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 1,988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2012, 8:52 am
On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reversed, in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:33 pm
Supreme Court case of Terry v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 8:55 am
Supreme Court decided New York Times v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 5:32 am
Several years ago, in Escriba v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:01 am
Javier Auyero, Routine Politics and Violence in Argentina: the Gray Zone of State Power (2007). [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 7:23 am
These results suggest that, even when they are delivering negative outcomes, the police can enhance their legitimacy by using fair procedures.USC, Pamela Karlan, Stanford, "The Law of Small Numbers: Carhart v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 11:00 pm
In the courts Reilly & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Rev 1) [2012] EWHC 2292 (Admin) High Court rejects challenge to Government’s compulsory work experience scheme on human rights and legality grounds. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Under the 1980 ruling in Owen v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:00 am
James V. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:44 am
Ethernet Innovations LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Hulu, LLC (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) District Court Delaware: Use of the terms ‘charge’ ‘recharger’ and ‘connector’ do not render claim indefinite: Intermec Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims:… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Patent Compliance Group - First false marking declaratory judgment action filed: North States Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
