Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 1581 - 1600
of 29,808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2019, 8:55 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 8:02 am
Tony Mauro has an article worth reading about the aftermath of Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:43 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of OhioOpinion Date: 9/26/11Cite: Office Depot, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:00 am
Several states and state agencies (state petitioners) challenge the primary annual fine PM standard. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
City of Hayward v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
Nellcor Puritan Bennett LLC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
Last week NY's most prominent state appellate level court formally fully adopted the Zubulake standard for e-discovery. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:46 am
Federal prosecutors, like those in state-level cases, have a number of enhancements that can be enacted to increase penalties upon conviction for serious crimes. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm
The judge questions the state’s interest: “leveling the playing field—promoting speech on one side of an issue or restricting speech on the other—is not a legitimate state interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
The Canadian decision's in Bouzari v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
The trial court, alas, erred in stating the relevant statistical concepts. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:23 pm
” Carefirst of Md., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:43 am
The defendant in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
In Marion v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 3:24 pm
On a 12(b) Motion to Dismiss, the court dismissed with prejudice her constitutional claims under section 1983 and dismissed without prejudice her other claims based on state law, essentially telling Lambert to bring the state law claims in state court.Turning to Lambert's constitutional claim, the court held that she failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Mehta found that the court must give the highest level of deference to the executive’s position that active hostilities continue to exist. [read post]
