Search for: "State v. List"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 27,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: Below is today's Criminal Law Appellate Court opinion: AC30974 - State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:55 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 8:05 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:33 am
Reminds IPBiz a bit of Game 7 of Mets v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:11 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:15 am
Magistrate Judge Denlow held a status hearing yesterday morning in the USA v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 5:32 pm
The list includes:Randy V. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 11:08 am
” In Lewis v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 8:33 pm
As a state institution, UMN is immune from IPR challenges. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 11:30 am
The list goes on. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:51 pm
The case will now be directed by the Chief Justice of India to be listed before a larger bench. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 8:43 pm
As set forth by Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court in its 2009 decision in Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
See id., at 1a–114a.The Colorado Supreme Court accordingly ordered Secre-tary Griswold not to “list President Trump’s name on the2024 presidential primary ballot” or “count any write-invotes cast for him. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 3:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 6:30 am
Supreme Court today denied cert. in a second church-state case, Faith Center Church v. [read post]
28 Jan 2003, 9:22 am
[JURIST] Although no cert grants were announced in Monday's regular Order List [PDF text], the US Supreme Court did grant cert Monday in Castro v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:21 am
United States, (Docket No. 10-648, cert. denied 3/21/2011) (Order List). [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:51 pm
United States, No. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:00 pm
Colorado (Docket No. 09-700) (Order List.) [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:03 am
We reported last week that the Supreme Court of the United States had decided the fate of the Ninth Circuit's decision in Dukes v. [read post]