Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 1581 - 1600 of 19,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2025, 3:41 am
To establish priority, Petitioner Kennedy had to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that it owns proprietary rights in "a mark or trade name previously used in the United States . . . and not abandoned . . . . [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
  Mark Walsh provided a view from the Courtroom for this blog. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am by Lazar Radic
Many observers—including Epic CEO Tim Sweeney—have marked this as an unmitigated loss for Epic. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
.* When its comes to "deadwood", leave it in the State of South Dakota and out of Trademark Office policyIs unused "deadwood"really cluttering up trade mark registers? [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
Lyle reported on the decisions in Fisher and United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 10:44 am by JURIST Staff
In 1993, in the case of Amaratunge v Sirimal, Justice Mark Fernando of Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court made a remark that remains relevant. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:59 pm by INFORRM
They mark the seriousness of the defamation and are a part of the vindication. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm by Marty Lederman
Earlier today, Mark Tushnet posted about Justice Thomas’s recent eye-opening concurrence in the Court’s denial of cert. in McKee v. [read post]