Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 13,833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Oklahoma state law provides that “if a vacancy or irrevocable resignation occurs in the office of a member of the United States Senate from Oklahoma” the state must hold a special election to fill the empty or to-be-empty seat. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 6:611, 616 (1998).)This insight may help untangle some of the discursive trajectories in the case and the declaraitons. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 1:57 am
In one of the most important antitrust cases in the history of our industry, the Google Android case (one of several pending Google v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 7:17 am
Dodge (Professor, University of California, Davis, School of Law) Should courts in the United States refuse to recognize and enforcement Chinese court judgments on the ground that China does not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the requirements of due process of law? [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 7:55 am
Balt USA, LLC, the United States District Court for the Central District of California recently denied a defendant’s motion to amend its invalidity contentions to add additional written description and enablement arguments, finding a lack of diligence by the defendant. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 7:55 am
Balt USA, LLC, the United States District Court for the Central District of California recently denied a defendant’s motion to amend its invalidity contentions to add additional written description and enablement arguments, finding a lack of diligence by the defendant. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 7:55 am
Balt USA, LLC, the United States District Court for the Central District of California recently denied a defendant’s motion to amend its invalidity contentions to add additional written description and enablement arguments, finding a lack of diligence by the defendant. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court refused to defend Roe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:20 am
Together these two court rulings, issued on the same day, reinforce the primacy of CEQA in challenging development projects throughout the State. [1] Save Berkeley’s Neighborhood v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:07 am
In United Federation of Churches v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:01 am
" The court quoted language from the United States Supreme Court's decision in Prince v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:00 am
The Petitioning States quickly moved to intervene in the Ninth Circuit to protect their interests previously represented by the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 2:55 pm
Ocean Street Extension Neighborhood Assn. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
Auxin Solar is a domestic manufacturer of modules based in San Jose, California, which affirmatively asserts standing as a producer of like products to those for which it is requesting the investigation. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 11:14 am
In Citizens’ Committee to Complete the Refuge et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 6:41 am
The United States District Court for the Central District of California recently granted a plaintiff’s motion to strike portions of the defendant’s expert report for the untimely disclosure of new invalidity theories that were not previously disclosed in the defendant’s invalidity contentions. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 6:41 am
The United States District Court for the Central District of California recently granted a plaintiff’s motion to strike portions of the defendant’s expert report for the untimely disclosure of new invalidity theories that were not previously disclosed in the defendant’s invalidity contentions. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 6:41 am
The United States District Court for the Central District of California recently granted a plaintiff’s motion to strike portions of the defendant’s expert report for the untimely disclosure of new invalidity theories that were not previously disclosed in the defendant’s invalidity contentions. [read post]
