Search for: "United States v. Grant" Results 1581 - 1600 of 26,095
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2010, 3:09 pm by Rob McKinney
The United States Supreme Court is considering granting a writ of certiorari  in Kentucky v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:30 pm
On May 20, 2015, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted final approval of a $1.5 million wage-and-hour class action settlement in Barrera v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 8:16 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that time granted to prepare pretrial motions is not automatically excludable under the Speedy Trial Act [18 USC § 3161(h)(1) text]. [read post]
25 Dec 2021, 10:47 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Here is an opinion from the United States Fifth Circuit that deals with life insurance. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Unions representing public employees are not state actors absent evidence of meaningful State participation in the activity underlying the complaintCallaghan v United Fedn. of Teachers, 2015 NY Slip Op 08049, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSupreme Court granted the United Federation of Teachers’ [UFT] motion to dismiss James V. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
  In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:31 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Nealy, No. 11-0615/AR followed by United States v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:17 pm by Tim Clancy
Execution of people with documented mental retardation is unlawful in the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:47 am by Tucker Chambers
It’s available in most stores across the United States…except for Wisconsin. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 7:36 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
This case presents an important development in Investor-State arbitration wherein consent is deemed to have been granted through an indirect means. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:00 pm
The question arises in Kucana v. [read post]