Search for: "ALEXANDER v. THE STATE" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2023, 12:46 am by Anthony Gaughan
Later, a version of interposition termed “Judicial Federalism” emerged as a constraint on federal legislative power in Printz v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
  Question: As a matter of originalist jurisprudence, do you think Alexander Bickel’s memorandum for Justice Felix Frankfurter in Brown v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am by Cody Poplin
In Syria, the Islamic State released 19 of the recently captured Assyrian Christians. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources The Algorithmic Law of Business and Human Rights: Constructing a Private Transnational Law of Ratings, Social Credit, and Accountability Measures, Larry Catá Backer, The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law, Matthew McQuilla, Pennsylvania State University Artificial Intelligence and the Right to Data Protection, Ralf Poscher, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:58 am by Amy Howe
Both Wilkes and Alexander Russell, a passenger in the car, were seriously injured; Wilkes suffered a traumatic brain injury. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm by Michael Lowe
Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 770 F.2d 399, 407 (4th Cir. 1985) and United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
While the law of unconscionability differs a great deal from state to state, in most states it has two general components: "procedural unconscionability" (that relates to how a contract was formed), and "substantive unconscionability" (which relates to the unfairness of particular contract terms). [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:20 am by Tom Goldstein
In substance, it was that the court had voted to overrule Roe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]