Search for: "CALIFORNIA v. WASHINGTON" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 9:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Of relevance to a recent trade secret case, captioned Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:26 am by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, famous in patent circles for his antisuit injunction and FRAND determination in the Microsoft v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:29 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  The Reporters express agreement with another controversial California opinion, Perdue v. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 9:28 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Hamilton is the Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
This arguement is valid in some states, specifically California and Washington. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Privacy in Social Media, Andrei Marmor, Cornell University – Law School The Ironic Privacy Act, Margaret Hu, Washington and Lee University – School of Law Privacy Losses as Wrongful Gains, Bernard Chao, University of Denver Sturm College of Law Protection for ‘Inferences Drawn:’ A Comparison between the General Data Protection Rule and the California Consumer Privacy Act, Jody Blanke, Mercer University – Stetson-Hatcher… [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:17 pm by Aaron Pelley
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Division One Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:57 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  For example, state legislatures in California, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Vermont, and Washington have passed statutes in recent years limiting employers’ ability to require arbitration of sexual harassment and (depending on the state) other claims. [read post]