Search for: "California v. United States" Results 1601 - 1620 of 12,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2024, 10:13 am by Eric Goldman
The court explains: California law does not categorically state that a contract can never be formed on the basis of browsewrap. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
This guide is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am by Ackerman Law Office
There is a new case that was making its way up to the United States Supreme Court called Friedrichs vs the California teachers Association. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Bayer Corp., 564 U.S. ---, 131 S.Ct. 2368, 2011 WL 768649 (6/16/11) (blogged here) the Supreme Court of the United States held that a District Court's denial of a Rule 23 class certification motion does not prevent separate plaintiffs from seeking certification in a separate state court action. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
On Tuesday, a California federal district court in Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 9:25 am by Gregory B. Williams
April 27, 2017), the Court granted the motion to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Central District of California of defendant TuffStuff Fitness International Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2025, 8:09 pm by Jim Robinson
Cal. 2024), the United States District Court for the Northern District of California addressed a significant environmental health dispute concerning the fluoridation of public drinking water. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:06 am by Spencer Persson
On June 19, 2017, the United States Supreme Court limited the ability of plaintiffs to pursue nationwide class actions in state court. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm by DMLP Staff
Medinger Source of Law: United StatesLegal Claims: OtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the District of MarylandLegal Counsel: Ezra Gollogly; Paul A. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
Because we focus here on the cy près distribution of unclaimed settlement proceeds, we note only that following a 1999 federal court trial of state and federal antitrust actions, the district court found against Microsoft, see United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:11 am by Docket Navigator
[T]his District is ranked 17th in the United States for weighted filings per judge (based on four judges as of March 31, 2017) while the Northern District of California is ranked 23rd based on fourteen judges as of March 31, 2017. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 10:35 am by Nora Freeman Engstrom, Robert L. Rabin
Regents of California (1976), which imposed a “duty to warn” on therapists, and Sindell v. [read post]