Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 1601 - 1620 of 8,632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2007, 6:20 am
Because “it does not appear beyond doubt that Plaintiffs cannot establish an actionable class action lawsuit,” id., at 741, the court denied the motion to dismiss.Download PDF file of Rios v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 5:28 am by Ken Krupat
  The recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court in Ludchen v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:08 pm
Superior Court (Turcios) and the opinion is here.SHAW VALENZA LLP - http://shawvalenza.com [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm by WIMS
      The Appeals Court determined that in the instant action, the district court ruled that the contribution bar in the 2001 Settlement does not apply to the Intervenors' cross-claims against Sherwin-Williams. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:37 am
  The Appellate Court, with one judge dissenting, rejected the defendant's claim; see State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
  (…) Before Wofsy filed the Review Proceeding, though, Sicre de Fontbrune brought the instant action in the Superior Court of California in Alameda County in November of 2013, seeking recognition of the astreinte judgment. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:09 pm
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443, that began with "Although exemplary damages are not available in overtime suits (see section 1194.2...) [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 11:51 am
The decisions on this topic divide into two streams at the Superior Court of Justice level, and there does not appear to be a Court of Appeal decision settling the matter. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court, 42 Cal.4th 443 (2007) remains viable law post-AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]