Search for: "Ely Lilly" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:09 am
So far, seven states have filed Medicaid recovery suits against Eli Lilly over the way it promoted Zyprexa. [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:59 pm
Here's my checklist|Fujifilm v AbbVie: practice, procedure and policy analysis|Overturning a trade mark opposition decision - Part 2 - SOULUXE - likelihood of confusion|Overturning a trade mark opposition decision - Part 1 - IWATCH, descriptive goods and acquired distinctivenessNever Too Late 143 [week ending on Sunday 9 April] |French court rules that resale right royalty must be only paid by sellers I Tune in LIVE for tomorrow's Eli Lilly v Actavis Supreme… [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:12 am
Never too late 78  [week ending on Sunday 27 December] – Zer-sum claim and lookalike products | 2015 Copyright Awards | Santa Claus and Section 52 | Jani writes on Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited | IP Hairballs |  Actavis v Eli Lilly | Power outage at USPTO | Santa's GC resigns | Pet rock and IP.Never too late 77 [week ending on Sunday 20 December] – GC on 5-stripe shoe mark | EPO BoA… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
When Sky v SkyKick leaves rightsholders in limbo | The Intellectual Property Owners Association | Report on IPO’s 2018 European Practice Committee Conference (1/2) |  Book review: Propertizing European Copyright – History, Challenges and Opportunities |  GDPR notification | Thursday Thingies | Around the IP Blogs.Never Too Late 194 [weeks ending 13th and 20th May] Important amendments under Mexican law regarding patents, utility models and industrial… [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
In many circumstances, she had to make a decision because the law required it but it was not necessarily the best thing for the family.Inevitably there was some discussion about the implications of Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:18 am
When Sky v SkyKick leaves rightsholders in limbo |  The Intellectual Property Owners Association | Report on IPO’s 2018 European Practice Committee Conference (1/2) |  Book review: Propertizing European Copyright – History, Challenges and Opportunities |  GDPR notification | Thursday Thingies | Around the IP Blogs.Never Too Late 194 [weeks ending 13th and 20th May] Important amendments under Mexican law regarding patents, utility models and industrial designs… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Image credits: Sleepwalking - GIPHYAmsterdam - Shovy Rahman PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 194 [weeks ending 13th and 20th May] Important amendments under Mexican law regarding patents, utility models and industrial designs | Decoding the Scope of Patent Protection: Singapore after Eli Lilly v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In Human Genome Sciences Inc. v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 the Supreme Court reversed the findings of the High Court and Court of Appeal. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
The answer is not clear-cut but as a general rule the post-filing data can only be ‘confirmatory’ of disclosure in the specification.As an aside, it is worth mentioning Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly where the main issue was how much data is required in the specification to support therapeutic use of an antibody to a new protein (see Katpost here).Why is it important to claim broadly in biotech? [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:30 am
| Tune in LIVE for tomorrow's Eli Lilly v Actavis Supreme Court showdown | French court rules that resale right royalty must be only paid by sellersNever Too Late 142 [week ending on Sunday 2 April] | Conference report: Online platforms and intermediaries in copyright law | Fun with Fujifilm Declarations! [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:33 am
 EssaysWas the Supreme Court right in Actavis v Eli Lilly to introduce a doctrine of equivalents when determining infringement of patents in the UK? [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that  test. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 2:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1350−52 (Fed. [read post]