Search for: "Goodwill v. Goodwill"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 2,133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 11:57 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am
Martha Elizabeth, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:12 am
(Shafron v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:43 am
If EMI allowed use of ENTREPRENEUR HALL OF FAME for the past fourteen years, should it now be allowed to prevent Magic Wand from protecting the goodwill it’s built up in that mark? [read post]
6 May 2011, 10:43 am
In Optical Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:43 am
In Optical Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:56 pm
The case of Hall v Goodwill Industries of Southern California (March 16, 2011) __ Cal.App.4th __, addresses the question of, for purposes of a right-to-sue letter: "one year from what? [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:18 am
Naturally Virgin Enterprises is entitled to expect no lower level of IP protection than any other business -- but it doesn't own the word 'virgin' outright and it can expect others to use it in ways which neither confuse the public nor damage their own equity in the goodwill of their brands. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
In Bennett v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:26 pm
Flowserve Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 7:37 am
In Gallagher v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:21 am
What is the difference between goodwill and lost sales? [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:36 am
PBM Products, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:16 pm
They’re parodies (because they mock the original work directly), and while that’s not dispositive of the issue, parodies are a form of use that’s strongly favored as fair following Campbell v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
Zatarain’s, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:32 am
In Acordia of Ohio LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
In Pfeiffer v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:06 pm
It is possible to sue in reliance on historic or residual goodwill in a brand that has not been used for some years (cf Ad-Lib Club v Granville [1972] RPC 673). [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
The complaint cites Justice Story's dicta in Lowell v Lewis (1817) which stated that inventions that are "injurious to the well being, good policy, or sound morals of society" are unpatentable. [read post]
