Search for: "Head v. State"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 13,579
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm
Judge Blackburn cited two cases in support of his authority to enter such an order: United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm
Despite it being a fairly minor ordeal, it’s not unusual at all to somehow feel as though the hammer of justice is about to be dropped square on your head. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 2:18 pm
” State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Case Commented On: Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia, 2022 ONSC 1303 (Can LII); 2023 ONCA 476 (CanLII) Intimate partner violence (IPV) takes many forms, all of which cause harm to survivors (who are disproportionately women and children). [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
In Montoya v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 9:37 am
This ruling has substantial implications for the social media addiction cases heading towards the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
Conti v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
In Skinner v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:44 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:42 am
The Supreme Court granted cert today in Carcieri v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 7:57 am
(V. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:31 pm
Sergeant Ade also observed defendant's head "nodding back and forth" and her "eyelids . . . drooping. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 10:49 am
State, 716 N.E.2d 919, 933 (Ind. 1999); Angleton v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 8:33 am
Admin. for Children’s Services v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 4:05 am
In Raidoo v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
The Alabama Supreme Court's horrendous, but so far outlier, opinion in Weeks v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:37 am
The Second Circuit has ordered Argentina to submit a payment proposal, following oral argument in the NML v. [read post]
