Search for: "Hurt v. United States"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 1,719
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2008, 9:53 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has delivered an opinion that highlights several important procedural issues having to do with LLCs and derivative suits. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:39 am
And in the United States, of course, you're allowed to publish true information, even if it hurts someone. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 3:14 pm
§ 7212(a); see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:15 pm
Yet you have no faith that the current Supreme Court of the United States will agree with you. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 2:01 pm
Nonetheless, the United States did not issue regulations on the use of asbestos until 1989; even today, consumer products can legally contain very small amounts of asbestos. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19] This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20] While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire goal of the FPGPA is to accomplish… [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:51 am
United States: hard cases make bad law. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
- Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:26 pm
" [See Allen v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(Patently-O) Patents Online announces new patent search engine (Patent Docs) SumoBrain now free (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Global - Copyright How music licensing rights can hurt music sales (Techdirt) Seth Godin - maybe art should be for its own sake and the enjoyment of the artist creating it (Copyfight) Africa Pressure to sign up to European Partnership Agreements mounts (Afro-IP) Australia Innovation policy in Australia -… [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
One of these items is United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:09 am
Defendant 2 claimed to have been hurt in six of those cases. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
From our perspective, medical monitoring's a run-of-the-mill damages claim, except for the fact nobody's been hurt. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:40 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 2:39 pm
See Hurt v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
Co., 42 NY2d 884, 885, quoting 30 NY Jur, Insurance, § 1099, p 484 [emphasis added]; see Agoado Realty Corp. v United Intl. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 6:00 am
This fall, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 3:03 pm
Equality is not an option in the United States. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
Levine from suing in state court when the products that hurt them had met federal standards. [read post]
