Search for: "In re P. Children" Results 1601 - 1620 of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2021, 3:38 pm by Russell Knight
Furthermore, a divorce often deals with children who’s obligations are enforceable for years until they reach adulthood (and beyond in the case of college and disability) Simply put, there are no statutes of limitations for divorces but there are definitely time limits. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 1:01 pm by familoo
Firstly, increasing numbers of cases ever since Baby P and a further ramping up of numbers since Re N (as set out at the foot of the judgment and by His Honour Judge Wildblood QC in his recent newsletter here, which is incidentally sets out a different approach from a different DFJ to the problem HHJ Bellamy was trying to tackle) are coupled with reducing numbers of court staff and general court efficiency. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 7:33 pm by Mark Zamora
§ 321(p), because they are not "generally recognized, among experts . . . as safe and effective," is supported by substantial judicial authority. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am by Schachtman
  Merrell challenged Swan’s unpublished, non-peer-reviewed re-analyses as not “generally accepted” under the Frye test. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:37 am by Bill Marler
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food handling or cooking.[43] Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) E. coli O157:H7 infections can lead to a severe, life-threatening complication called hemolytic uremic syndrome (“HUS”).[44] HUS accounts for the majority of the acute and chronic illness and death caused by E coli bacteria.[45]… [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
The ICO had a blog post “ICO creates practical design guidance to help embed children’s privacy standards”. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
Those who have visited the town will tell you that it is a friendly place; the kind of place where people raise children, or live out their golden years. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  The judge in the case of “In re Yahoo! [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
The strong presumption in favour of open court proceedings (and therefore against anonymity of litigation participants) has recently been re-emphasized by the Supreme Court in A.B. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
The Montana Supreme Court rejected petitioners’ claim that this statute violates the First Amendment. 2011 MT 328, 363 Mont. 220, 271 P. 3d 1. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:18 am by Maxwell Kennerly
It wouldn’t surprise me if P&G turned around on some of the losing claims and sued the plaintiffs’ firms — many of whom settled hundreds, some thousands of those cases successfully — claiming the whole thing was a fraud on the court. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
A clause 6 (children) complaint by Alex Neil MSP against the Scottish Sun was not upheld; while a clause 1 (accuracy) complaint by Lutfur Rahman against the Daily Telegraph was upheld. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
.), at p. 415, applied in Re F (in utero), supra. [read post]