Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 3,261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 am
United States, and last Term’s Davis v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:45 am
Recent Supreme Court decisions such as Hudson v Michigan (2006) and Herring v United States (2009) have sparked a new debate over the efficacy of exclusionary remedy, and once again drawn its continued viability as a constitutional mandate into question. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:27 am
At the Michigan View, Jeffrey Hadden previews next week’s oral argument in Davis v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm
It too would be determined in each state by the state's own processes, subject perhaps to the possibility, flagged in the literature on Powell v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:57 am
United States Fish & Wildlife – 5/26/15. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am
United States, __ Fed. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm
United States 20-1594Issue: Whether the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act’s felony prohibitions on “dispensing” drugs reach the administering of drugs by practitioners, which has been left to state and local regulation for more than a century. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
Access to abortion has been decimated in the United States since June when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 4:44 am
As Wikipedia notes, ineffective assistance is a claim raised by a convicted criminal defendant that their attorney’s performance was so ineffective that it deprived them of the constitutional right guaranteed by the Assistance of Counsel Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:54 am
United States,” said Colon. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:00 pm
United States 15-537Issue: (1) Whether, under Ashe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
House of Representatives and the Senate already have determined that Donald Trump’s conduct on January 6, 2021 “warrants … disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am
• Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:05 pm
Cal., filed December 14, 2011).Neal Fortin is the author of Food Regulation: Law, Science, Policy, and Practice, and he is Professor and Director of the Michigan State University Institute for Food Laws and Regulations, where he teaches online courses in Food Regulation in the United States, International Food Law, and Codex Alimentarius. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 1:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Whether a particular property has “wetlands” as defined by the Federal Wetland Delineation Manual and whether the wetlands constitute “waters of the United States” is not a matter easily discernable by anybody. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 12:55 pm
The Court did decide one case this week, United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
United States, 346 F.3d 386, 399 (3d Cir.2003) ("[T]he Court in Illinois Council seemed to read Michigan Academy as creating an exception to the channeling requirement of § 405(h) in those cases where no judicial review is available at all. [read post]
