Search for: "O'Connor Law" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2008, 7:56 pm
"We believe that, without minimizing the seriousness of the police officer's conduct or in any way condoning it, it was open to the trial judge to find that reasonable members of the community could well conclude that the exclusion of 77 pounds of cocaine, with a street value of several millions of dollars, and the potential to cause serious grief and misery to many, would bring the administration of justice into greater disrepute than would its admission," [Associate Chief… [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:21 am by Stephen Gillers
" Scalia used similar "ad personam" (the inclusive term for "ad hominem") language in response to Justice O';Connor's opinion in Webster, describing it as "irrational. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:31 am
As a replacement for O'Connor, a centrist who voted to uphold abortion rights and affirmative action, he would probably move the court's overall balance to the right. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
 When I was a college senior struggling to figure out whether to go to law school or business school (I preferred saving the world with a law degree, but saw a business career as a safer way to financial security), and what to do with my life in either discipline -- rather than taking a t'ai chi harmonious approach, not having learned t'ai chi yet -- a close relative panned my consideration of possibly being a trial lawyer. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
"  The dripping scorn with which he would attack his colleagues was not only bad form but self-defeating, as he alienated potential allies (by, among other things, obliviously insulting Sandra Day O'Connor immediately upon becoming her colleague), and his arguments were often "pure applesauce. [read post]
25 Apr 2025, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, April 25, 2025 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of April 18-24, 2025 Is Your Board Asking the Really Tough Questions about Risk? [read post]
25 Apr 2025, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, April 25, 2025 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of April 18-24, 2025 Is Your Board Asking the Really Tough Questions about Risk? [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
" She went on to explain how the majority's convoluted logic and mistreatment of both federal law and precedent effectively extinguishes many valid sixth amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claims. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:56 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
Carhart was a moderate decision that avoided both extremes and, because of that, produced a separate opinion by Justices Thomas, joined by Justice Scalia (rejecting abortion rights altogether and questioning Congress's use of the Commerce Clause to regulate abortion), as well as a dissenting opinion consisting of the 4 Justices who, with the now-retired Justice O'Connor, had formed the majority in Stenberg. [read post]
17 Aug 2004, 12:05 pm
I mean, according to Justice O'Connor, that lone employee of the state plus four of his colleagues were able to produce "a No. 10 earthquake," one that has never been measured in the Richter scale. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 9:43 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
So... retired Justices Souter, Stevens, and O'Connor might step up to decide who to disqualify in — let's say — the case about the constitutionality of the individual mandate. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote for a plurality in Hamdi v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:01 am
  Some, like former Justice O'Connor and Justice Kennedy, have a deeply-rooted belief that it's important to be liked by the intelligentsia. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:55 am
| Copyright law in the UAE: it's not what you might think | Monday Miscellany | Major changes to trademark law in Turkey: read all about it [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
"We have very different backgrounds," Ginsburg said of herself and O'Connor. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 9:01 am by Jeff Gamso
Is it really right for the Constitution to mean whatever Anthony Kennedy thinks it is, now that it's no longer what Sandra Day O'Connor thought it was (or Lewis Powell from whom O'Connor took over the role)? [read post]