Search for: "P. v. House"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 3,792
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2015, 10:31 pm
It provides in part:Resolved, the House of _______ concurring, That the 78th General Convention of The Episcopal Church authorize the use of “The Celebration and Blessing of a Marriage,” “The Blessing of a Civil Marriage” and “An Order for Marriage” from The Book of Common Prayer 1979, and “The Witnessing and Blessing of a Lifelong Covenant” from Liturgical Resources I, for all marriages legal in the civil jurisdiction in which the liturgy… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:31 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:55 am
Bank of America v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm
The brief explains that Maureen P. [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:59 am
In the case of Winer v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
They can be found in the original via the link above] Introduction The massive John P. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:00 am
Records systems are becoming a network of applications existing in-house, in mobile devices, and in centralized, shared utility services such as “the cloud. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:46 pm
When we arrived in Brazil, and my mother managed this work, she chose teach at a school for children of farmers, which was 46 km away from our house. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:08 pm
Justice Elena Kagan made the same point in her opinion last year in Michigan v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:56 am
British Transport Commission, [1963] 2 Q.B. 650, at p. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:50 am
At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley explains why “the biggest beneficiary of a win for Texas” in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:02 am
Buttars, 340 P.3d 183 (2015). [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
Troxel v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:19 pm
(See Seigel, New York Practice §437, p. 708, 3d Ed. 1999). [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
All of this tended to justify the subsequent authorities – R v Basingstoke and Deane BC ex p Bassett (1983) 10 HLR 125; R v Brent LBC ex p Awua; R v Harrow LBC ex p Fahia; R v Camden LBC ex p Aranda (1997) 30 HLR 76; R v Hackney LBC ex p Ajayi (1997) 30 HLR 473 – in which different acts were said to have broken (or had the potential to break) the chain of… [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:58 am
The brief explains that Maureen P. [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:57 pm
The Supreme Court in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:37 pm
P. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:18 am
In the conventional story, Justice Joseph P. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:03 am
Dudley & Andrew P. [read post]
