Search for: "PIERCE v PIERCE" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2017, 7:44 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Despite some scuttlebutt, Molon Motor does nothing to pierce the DTSA's ban on inevitable disclosure claims in the employment context. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
 In Adams v Cape Industries plc [1990] Ch 433 the court rejected the single economic unit argument made in the DHN Ltd v Tower Hamlets LBC [1976] 1 WLR 852 decision, and also the approach that the court will pierce the corporate veil if it is necessary to achieve justice. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 9:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., 712 F.3d 1349, 1354 (9th Cir. 2013); United Nuclear Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 5:23 am by Gilbert Holmes
Nebraska (teaching a foreign language before 8th grade), Pierce v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:09 am
Veiled Cat Although not in any way connected with IP, the scope of the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil is to be considered in VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp and others. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:59 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
David StevensonCase Number: 15-cv-03528 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey)Case Filed: May 26, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 29, 2015 6/30/15 9/28/15 2015-63 In the Matter of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corporation Administrative Proceeding File No.: 3-16567 Case Filed: June 1, 2015 Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 1, 2015 6/30/15 9/28/15 2015-62 SEC v. [read post]