Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2014, 2:26 am
As such, “the relevant marks coexist until they no longer coexist”, whatever the precise reason. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm
Kathleen Hochul signed new legislation changing the standards by which county legislative lines are drawn in the state. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm
Kathleen Hochul signed new legislation changing the standards by which county legislative lines are drawn in the state. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
This is an academic exercise, acknowledging that a trial on racist defamation would likely fail on the precision of the imputations, which are often deliberately vague. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm by Giesela Ruehl
There is no better example of this interaction than the Shape v Supreme litigation ongoing before Dutch courts, with the most recent decision in this dispute rendered in December 2019 in Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (“SHAPE”) et al v Supreme Site Service GmbH et al (Supreme), COURT OF APPEAL OF ‘s-HERTOGENBOSCH, Case No. 200/216/570/01, Ruling of 10 December 2019 (the ‘CoA Decision’). [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
We hold that the district court applied an inc orrect legal standard in determining Defendant's summary judgment motion. [read post]