Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2010, 1:36 pm
Clive Stafford Smith is the founder of Reprieve and has spent 25 years working on behalf of people facing the death penalty in the USA. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
It worries me when young people today at universities are not able to express themselves. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:41 pm
Slydell v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:43 am
Judging by the response and the downloads, people seem to enjoy them. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
During the session, I joked that Trump v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
Moyle, D.C.L. of Lincoln’s Inn, Barrister-at-Law,Fellow and Late Tutor of New College, OxfordFifth Edition (1913)http://www.gutenberg.org/files/5983/5983-h/5983-h.htm * PROOEMIVM *In the name of Our Lord, Jesus Christ. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
This was exacerbated by the fact that Amazon did not attempt to prevent any confusion by making it clear to people searching for “MTM Special Ops” products that it did not sell them. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
Even Google acknowledged this recently in a submission to a United Kingdom House of Lords Communication Committee’s inquiry on regulation of the internet. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 12:53 am
Boumediene v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 4:49 am
[v] I don’t think it was even close. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
In Thuraissigiam’s case, relevant evidence would have been the record of violence and persecution against people of Tamil ethnicity in Sri Lanka. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws… What is plainly required is an international agreement to govern communications on the web and, in particular, to determine whether they are to be regulated by an agreed set of supra-national regulations or, if not, to provide a generally acceptable means of deciding which domestic law should apply to any offending publication. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Lord Macdonald of River Glaven (Warden, Wadham College, Oxford University; formerly Director of Public Prosecution, England and Wales), Dr. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
Taylor (K.B. 1769); Donaldson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:28 am
Zöchling v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
The effect of s97 is limited to the life of proceedings (Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878, [2007] 1 FLR 1). [read post]
