Search for: "People v. Mines"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2021, 9:05 pm
They also represent a serious management challenge for agencies, one compounded by reports of comments in certain high profile rulemakings attributed to people who did not submit them or to nonexistent people—not to mention comments submitted by bots. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:10 am
He evidently holds even stronger views that mine. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm
Can't you people keep everything in one place? [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 10:48 pm
The settlement administrator has reported that 9,820 people filed qualifying claims for the Actos fund. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:19 am
It reminded me of Kennedy's opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Law publishing industry veteran and innovator, Jason Wilson has been pondering on relevant matters as the case of ROSS v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
For example, a few journalists completely blew NFIB v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:16 pm
That is, we assume that law is a, if not the, primary determinant of people’s conduct. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 8:03 am
I order mine from tinyprints.com because I always customize them. 6. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:28 pm
It's an ex post v. ex ante thing. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:47 pm
People often have little concept on exactly what trade-offs they may be making, and the new government proposals largely address this by demanding clear and transparent notice of privacy practices. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 10:52 am
&id=GALE%7CA483862228&v=2.1&u=mnaumntwin&it=r&p=PROF&sw=w&authCou [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 10:20 am
In Roverano v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
“People in suits fighting,” as a friend of mine phrased it at the time. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm
Whereas the football innovations were all eventually adopted by other teams, Gladwell’s story makes the point that innovations are regularly resisted by people doing well under the current system; in fact they can be crushed if you convince enough people that doing the thing “right” requires avoiding innovation. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am
For the Symposium on the Constitution and Economic InequalityCynthia EstlundJoseph Fishkin and William Forbath, in their book-in-progress, have brilliantly exposed and mined a once-powerful, mostly-forgotten vein of constitutional political economic thought: the notion that widely shared economic opportunity, and a broad middle class flanked by neither an underclass nor an oligarchic overclass, are essential foundations of our republican form of government. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 10:47 am
Martin v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:44 pm
The court, in United States v. [read post]
