Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 1601 - 1620 of 8,626
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Peter Jaszi: mentioned questions in Salinger cases about whether being made available in archives ought to count as available to public. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 7:20 am by Nicolas Round (Bristows)
  If that turns out to the case then Illumina Cambridge Limited v Latvia MGI Tech SIA and others is a substantial judgment to mark this departure. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:47 pm by Richard Hunt
And to conclude this section, the inevitable Peter Strojnik case. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:36 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In last week’s New York Business Divorce, Peter Mahler wrote about an important new decision with far-reaching implications for New York LLC owners. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Reuters had a piece “HK security chief says communications surveillance can come under security law” Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 27974-20 Garrity v Scotsman.com, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation. 12131-20 Emmett v Daily Mirror, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019, No breach – after investigation. 11860-20 Bunglawala v… [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am by Sarah Waller
The UT gave judgment on 20th March 2020 (Martin Rodger QC, Deputy Chamber President, and Peter D McCrea FRICS). [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued what many at the time perceived as a landmark decision, PepsiCo Inc. v. [read post]