Search for: "Powell v. Powell" Results 1601 - 1620 of 1,973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am by Curtis Bradley, Jack Goldsmith
To be sure, the issue is not entirely settled because the Supreme Court, in Goldwater v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:11 am by Robert J. Reinstein
Madison was emphatic in The Federalist Papers that neither House could impose additional qualifications, and the Supreme Court so held unanimously in Powell v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  Proximate cause of damage to oil rig was an insured peril (waves), not inherent vice: “inherent vice” in insurance cases should be narrowly construed to exclude anything caused by external accidents Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:42 pm by NL
Brighton And Hove City Council v Alleyn & Ors [2011] EW Misc 6 (CC) Brighton brought a possession claim against a number of travellers who had occupied part of a park. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:42 pm by NL
Brighton And Hove City Council v Alleyn & Ors [2011] EW Misc 6 (CC) Brighton brought a possession claim against a number of travellers who had occupied part of a park. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]