Search for: "Ross v. Ross"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 2,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
The first is Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am
Commentary comes from Ross Runkel at his eponymous blog. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
"More fundamentally, preclusive effect is limited to only those 'issues that were actually litigated, squarely addressed and specifically decided' " (Church v New York State Thruway Auth., 16 AD3d 808, 810 [3d Dept 2005], quoting Ross v Medical Liab. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:45 am
In a legal malpractice decision (arising from a medical malpractice case) we see Justice Shulman of Supreme Court, New York County writing: "The doctrine of equitable estoppel may bar a defendant from asserting the statute of limitations when the plaintiff "was induced by fraud, misrepresentations or deception to refrain from filing a timely action" (Ross v Louise Wise Sews., Inc., 8 NY3d 478, 491 [2007], quoting Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442,… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
In a recent legal malpractice (arising from a medical malpractice case) we see Justice Shulman of Supreme Court, New York County writing: "The doctrine of equitable estoppel may bar a defendant from asserting the statute of limitations when the plaintiff "was induced by fraud, misrepresentations or deception to refrain from filing a timely action" (Ross v Louise Wise Sews., Inc., 8 NY3d 478, 491 [2007], quoting Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442, 448-449 [1978];… [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
Ross, K. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 1:23 pm
In Stokeling v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:54 am
., Yurman Design, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:54 am
Opinions A slip-and-fall in a hospital does not qualify as a “health care liability” claim LEZLEA ROSS v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:03 pm
Reed v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel notes that the court summarily reversed in CNH Industrial v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
First on the agenda was Byrd v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 11:13 am
See Euryclei Partners LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 N.Y.3d 553, 559 (2009); Ross v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
In Kisor v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am
In Ayestas v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” At his eponymous blog, Ross Runkel outlines “the essential points” in AFSCME’s brief in Janus v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 11:13 am
See Euryclei Partners LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 N.Y.3d 553, 559 (2009); Ross v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
The first was Christie v. [read post]
