Search for: "SCOTT v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 3,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
I doubt it.Probably the best example of being on the wrong side of history is the Dred Scott decision which held that Americans of African descent had no rights under the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
With nearly half of the country now living in states which have legalized marijuana at least for medical purposes, it is no longer accurate to state that there is “no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States” — if this was ever true to begin with. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
With nearly half of the country now living in states which have legalized marijuana at least for medical purposes, it is no longer accurate to state that there is “no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States” — if this was ever true to begin with. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:46 am
United States, in which the Court will interpret a federal statute that imposes additional criminal penalties on repeat offenders. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
United States The Boston Herald has dropped its appeal and agreed to pay US$903,000 to end a libel case arising out of a 2009 story alleging that Joanna Marinova had enaged in sexual acts with a “killer con” Research and Resources “Privacy, Democracy and Freedom of Expression”, Annabelle Lever, University of Geneva, SSRN Next week in the courts We are only aware of one application this week, in the case of Prince Alwaleed v Forbes Magazine on 5… [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
It does not aim at marriage, but, rather, at preventing early parenthood and investing in young people’s education and human capital.Sawhill proposes to “change the default” to reduce the staggeringly high percentage of unplanned and unwanted births in the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:05 pm
The founders of the United States, in writing the Fourth Amendment and in banning “general warrants,” were concerned about the security of their papers. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:31 am
United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
Scott, 524 U.S. 357 1998), but the `sole purpose’ of the rule `is to deter future 4th Amendment violations,’ Davis v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Scott v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
Yet, over a century later, Justice Scalia in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:29 am
Newman v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm
United States] Housing disparate impact theory, dodged by administration last time around, returns to Court [Bloomberg, Daniel Fisher; Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
His dissent ten years later in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:07 am
United States?) [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:05 am
From SSRN:Kara Loewentheil, Satanists, Scott Walker, & Contraception: A Partial Account of Hobby Lobby's Implications for State Law, (Harvard Law & Policy Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2015, Forthcoming).Robert J. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
District Court took up a loose end left by the Supreme Court’s holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
