Search for: "STATE v MURPHY" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am by Jordan Brunner
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”2 The failure to file a timely oath cannot be cured by subsequently filing the required oath, Informal Opinion of the Attorney General, 86-41.3 "Where ... the individual was present at the board meeting at which he was appointed and thus had actual notice of his appointment, written notice thereof was not required to commence the 30-day period," McDonough v Murphy, 92 AD2d 1022, affirmed 59 NY2d 941.4 Judicial notice is the recognition by a judicial body or an… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:47 pm by Richard Mumford
The Supreme Court also described in strong terms the effect on the individual of such measures – “drastic”, “oppressive” and having the effect that “designated persons are effectively prisoners of the state. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
Gregory ValenzaThe Daily Journal2 November 2007REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:49 am
The case was the subject of a 1992 book, Fatal Subtraction: The Inside Story of Buchwald v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:37 am by Eugene Volokh
Rev. 731 (2013)); Daniel Lyne and Ted Folkman of Murphy & King were kind enough to serve as our pro bono counsel. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This appears to have started with Murphy v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:23 am by Kevin Kaufman
Despite almost half the states legalizing sports betting since the Supreme Court overturned the federal ban in Murphy v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Recently appointed Judge Murphy’s concurrence, however, suggested that the statutory language and other rules of construction compelled a different finding: authorship, too, should be subject to the rule of Petrella and the remedies created by a successful authorship claim should merely stretch back only three years. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 2:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court used that standard in 1938 in the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am by Don Cruse
Workers compensation death benefits STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT v. [read post]