Search for: "Springs v. United States"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 1,984
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Book Chapters: Rishi Batra, Integrative v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm
In remarks from National Defense University, he described the current nature of the terrorist threat confronting the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
Robert Sherwin’s article Ambiguity in Anti-SLAPP Law and Frivolous Litigation is cited in the following article: George Wyeth et al., The Impact of Citizen Environmental Science in the United States, 49 ELR 10237 (2019). 5. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
At the same time, the state's responsibility of deference appears to be deficient. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
Bower v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
or Groves v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The couple returned to the United States in 1957. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
State of Ohio, No.7-3808 (6th Cir. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
When Massachusetts began to let same-sex couples marry in the spring of 2004 in response to the 2003 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling, the impact outside of the state was sharply limited by the Attorney General's interpretation of an old statute forbidding marriage licenses to out-of-staters whose home state would not allow them to marry. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 3:54 am
Perhaps they should consider adopting the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justice never reported the flight to Palm Springs. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Bookstores, g., United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 1:10 am
As I wrote last spring, Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
United States, 137 U. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
