Search for: "State v Richards" Results 1601 - 1620 of 8,992
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg (via How Appealing), Richard Re explains that in Ramos v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
Reinstatement following separation from service while on "workers' compensation leave" pursuant to §71 of the Civil Service Law Matter of Richard Lazzari v Town of Eastchester, 2009 NY Slip Op 04239, Decided on May 26, 2009, Appellate Division, Second Department §71 of the Civil Service Law provides for the granting of "workers' compensation leave" to an employee of the State or a political subdivision of the… [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am by Allison Trzop
Herrmann, United States v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:22 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States of America (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlT.W. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
E.L., in which the Justices ruled that states must recognize an adoption by a same-sex parent that occurred in another state, comes from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, German Lopez of Vox, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Danielle Blevins of Talk Radio News, Samuel Lieberman of New York, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Nolan McCaskill of Politico, and Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:18 am by Richard Katskee
Richard Katskee is the Legal Director at Americans United for Separation of Church and State. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:17 pm by Richard Samp
Richard Samp is chief counsel of the Washington Legal Foundation, which filed an amicus brief in support of the employers in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 2:57 am by Sean Wajert
Last week, the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy held a hearing "Examining the State of Judicial Recusals after Caperton v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 1:38 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The expedited briefing in the emergency appeal in that case -- State v. [read post]