Search for: "State v. Bell" Results 1601 - 1620 of 3,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2023, 6:58 am by Mark Ashton
Bell, that approved sterilization on the basis that “three generations of imbeciles are enough. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5456, looks like a routine hold for Setser v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 10:16 am
The Court also concluded that, even if the PCIGC were an "insurer," and the penalties were part of the "covered claim," it was immune from the assessment of late-payment penalties under the provisions of Section 9-314(a) of the Insurance Article and Section 5-412 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article.The court's official headnote adequately captures the substance of the majority opinion, but in dissent, Judge Wilner (joined by Cheif Judge Robert Bell)… [read post]
12 Apr 2025, 11:42 pm by Frank Cranmer
Regular readers will recall R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin), in which the claimants argued that the fact that legal recognition of religious wedding ceremonies under English law did not extend to weddings carried out in accordance with their humanist beliefs discriminated against them unjustifiably and breached their Convention rights under Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:47 am by Larry
The Container Store v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
   The OPQ case provides one possible “way out” of this unsatisfactory state of affairs. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 5:57 pm
  The SSRN abstract states: Last term, in Ashcroft v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 7:51 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Here is part of the abstract:In the attempt to decipher what is required to plead a claim for relief in federal court after the Supreme Court’s decisions in Bell Atlantic Corporation v. [read post]
Citigroup Inc. et al., for failing to meet the pleading standard set by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:03 pm by Abhinav Chandrachud
(5) Examine the impact of the judgment in Natco v Bayer and its significance for developing countries in the field of compulsory licensing.The committee also organizes the Belles-Lettres J.E. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: Giannicos v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:33 am by Dave
Twombly (2007) and Ashcroft v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Recently, in Eurocopter v. [read post]