Search for: "State v. C. S." Results 1601 - 1620 of 37,712
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
’ Some more quotes from the article: ‘The court again referred to the Bundespatentgericht’s preliminary opinion (…), asking in particular the defendants to comment on the BPatG’s opinion and why they thought it was incorrect’ ‘References were also made to opinions by experts on the invention and the prior art, but the court stated that it was the quality of the argument, not who made it, which mattered – given that two… [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Importantly, today’s ruling does not impact NanoString’s legal ability to market or sell CosMx SMI products for protein detection in the European Union, nor does it impact the lawful selling of any NanoString CosMx SMI products in the United States, the United Kingdom or the rest of the world outside of the EU member states participating in the UPC system. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz
This was spelled out quite unequivocally by the Court in C-357/19: “… compliance by a Member State with the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU is a condition for the enjoyment of all the rights deriving from the application of the Treaties to that Member State. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(b)(1) ["[c]onstitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of 'course of conduct'"]; see Thomas v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
Felicito a Cuba por su presidencia exitosa del G-77 y le agradezco la cálida bienvenida y la hospitalidad que me ha brindado. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
However, only certain forms of IPV were subject to legal sanction historically – primarily physical and sexual abuse, although sexual assault against a spouse was only criminalized in 1983 (see Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, s 278). [read post]