Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 7,501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2021, 3:53 pm
In Marvel Characters, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
State. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
The Court found Congress's purpose in enacting the NSPA was to `assist the States' efforts to foil the “roving criminal,” whose movement across state lines. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:25 pm
Many states have their vacancies for judges filled through a typical election. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:25 pm
Many states have their vacancies for judges filled through a typical election. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 4:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
New York State's Civil Service Law §75(1) provides an employee in the classified service of a public employer covered by the statute "shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges"; and 2. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:14 am
In Everson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:57 am
Cano v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:00 am
New York State's Civil Service Law §75(1) provides an employee in the classified service of a public employer covered by the statute "shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges"; and 2. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
Chapman, University of Georgia School of Law, has posted Money for Missionaries: Rethinking Establishment Clause History:In Everson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:30 am
Over at Jotwell, Reuel Schiller reviews Sarah Milov's The Cigarette: A Political History (The Cigarette and the State).The Federal Judicial Center has been "live-tweeting" Schenck v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:14 am
In Everson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:28 am
Each nominee, however, must be judged on the totality of their views, character, and opinions. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 10:00 am
Temporary appointments Coxen v. [read post]
5 Oct 2024, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:41 am
On January 20, 2009, the Third Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
The United States Supreme Court accepted certiorari in City of Ontario v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 4:12 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged in March about the court’s rejecting the religious accommodation claim in this case, but the court (in Jama v. [read post]
