Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 1601 - 1620 of 10,077
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 10:13 am
CROSS-POSTED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER PAYMENT The United States Supreme Court recently ruled in CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court observed that at issue in this was the application of the "well-settled" defense, which defense must be established by a preponderance of the evidence. 42 U.S.C. 11603(e)(2)(B) . [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:29 am by Rosalind English
Article 13(b) mitigates that obligation if there is a “grave risk” of “physical or psychological harm. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division rejected the toll collector’s argument that his absences were approved and medically justified and therefore excused for the purposes of maintaining any disciplinary action against him.In Dickinson v New York State Unified Ct. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 6:01 am by Josh Blackman
Option 1.b: The individual plaintiffs have standing, but the states do not have standing. [read post]