Search for: "State v. Sharp" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: El Diwany v Ministry of Justice & the Police, Norway, heard 16 March 2011 (Sharp J). [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
United States The Socially Aware Blog has a post which considers a recent decision made by the Sixth Circuit in Signature Management Team, LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law)   United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:27 pm
The answer, in a word, is federalism, and the New Haven story is an interesting although unintended consequence of the 1997 decision in Printz v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Americans overwhelmingly want sharp reductions of unregulated money in election campaigns, with federal enforcement of rules and disclosure of all donors to campaigns. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:33 pm by Alison LaCroix
United States (1997) (and that lurked behind the decision in Medellin v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Rahimi’s lawyers say a Supreme Court decision two years ago in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:13 am by Josh Wright
Judge Saris’s district court opinion denying the motion to exclude one of the plaintiff’s economic experts in  Natchitoches Parish Hospital v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
On 24 May 2017 in the case of Mohareb v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 645) McCallum J refused leave to plead a claim against the State on the basis of vicarious liability for a statement of the Attorney-General which was republished in the media. [read post]