Search for: "State v. Stai"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 16,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 11:33 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:50 am
"And:The case, Baze v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:04 am
Galarsa and Piplack did not address whether the representative claims in state court should be stayed, while Gregg ruled that the representative claims should be stayed but due to the language of the arbitration agreement at issue. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
The Fifth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:32 am
Among other reasons, the court said staying the Rule would remove uncertainty and confusion by restoring a uniform definition of “waters of the United States” nationwide. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 9:09 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:10 pm
On June 27, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
The Township withdrew its violation notice and agreed to stay enforcement of the ordinance. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 10:19 am
Original Post The Washington State Supreme Court has withdrawn its January Opinion in the long-running Yousoufian v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:50 pm
Parrish and United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm
Howe (Motion to Stay; Voting Rights Act; Legislative Redistricting) Temple v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 1:44 pm
The North Carolina legislature enacted the law in the wake of the Court’s 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 5:30 am
Trunk v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
The case is Osprey Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
The case cite Wu v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 11:22 am
He stayed his decision until noon November 20th to give the state time to seek an additional stay from a higher court. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:39 pm
Citing its 2006 decision in Howland v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 7:18 am
Fed’n of State, Cnty., & Mun. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
In Belmont v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:22 pm
Judge Corley has just granted the latter:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
