Search for: "T-7 Inc" Results 1601 - 1620 of 8,452
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2020, 3:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 See Eighth Circuit on Target on Appeal; In re Sketcher’s USA Inc. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:11 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors, heard 20-23 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House… [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
”[6] Judge Rakoff’s point is by no means limited to forensic evidence, and it has been acknowledged more generally by Professor Daniel Capra, the Reporter to the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules: “the key to Daubert is that cross-examination alone is ineffective in revealing nuanced defects in expert opinion testimony and that the trial judge must act as a gatekeeper to ensure that unreliable opinions don’t get to the jury in the first place. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
” §§80.2 and 80-A.2 of the Civil Service Law set out the effect, or lack thereof, of “interruptions in service” in the event of resignation followed by a reinstatement; appointment to a position in the unclassified service and other types of absences or leaves.Abolishment of positionsAs to mechanics, the Attorney General has concluded that there must be an actual and lawful abolishment of a position in order to lawfully remove an employee from his or her position pursuant… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
” §§80.2 and 80-A.2 of the Civil Service Law set out the effect, or lack thereof, of “interruptions in service” in the event of resignation followed by a reinstatement; appointment to a position in the unclassified service and other types of absences or leaves.Abolishment of positionsAs to mechanics, the Attorney General has concluded that there must be an actual and lawful abolishment of a position in order to lawfully remove an employee from his or her position pursuant… [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [2]  Frye v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:00 am by Thomas Key
Replacing "Old No. 7 Brand" with "The Old No. 2" is not the sort of image that one may expect Jack Daniels to seek to portray, were it to begin making dog toys. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:02 am by Kristian Soltes
Any swipe, dip, or tap transaction at a merchant POS terminal won’t require a signature. . . . [read post]
6 May 2020, 1:08 pm by Elliot Setzer
North Dakota and South Dakota On April 7, North Dakota Gov. [read post]
6 May 2020, 7:13 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Number Word Mark 1 6044389 CAMPAIGN AD-CLOUD 2 6042101 PASIC 3 6042098 KEEP MI SMILE 4 6041679 FOOTFIXR 5 6041624 WEIRD WAVES PODCAST 6 6041422 GONZO MUSEUM 7 6041419 GONZO GALLERY 8 6041347 LONGVIDA OPTIMIZED CURCUMIN 9 6044127 DIAMOND SHINE 10 6044098 JUST ONE PENNY 11 6044299 SPORT SERIES 12 6040693 DREAMSTAR 13 6040641 CLEARLY KOSCIUSKO 14 6044251 PUMPKIN CLOVE 15 6040557 QSRSOFT 16 6040478 DA BRAT 17 6040451 NEBULA 18 6040421 CONNECTME 19 6040412 MEI JAYLON SMITH MINORITY… [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:26 pm by Brittany Walter and Steven Hollman
Believed by many to be the key to ending the lockdown and getting closer to a state of “normalcy,” the unpatentability of certain diagnostic tests[7] may disincentivize sharing methodologies, and hinder the necessary scalability to enable widespread testing. [read post]