Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2018, 12:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Court orders addressed to third parties (chiefly in libel cases): Here too Google generally has no legal obligation to deindex material—if you sue me for libel and get an injunction finding that my page libeled you and that I must remove it, that generally doesn't bind Google (though the Hassell v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 10:21 am by Eric Goldman
Google * Section 230 Protects YouTube’s Removal of User’s Videos–Lancaster v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 3:38 pm by Giles Peaker
Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809 and Antoniades v Villiers; A-G Securities v Vaughan [1990] AC 417, HL. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Although the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination based on disability by entities receiving federal funds, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) extended this protection more broadly to non-federally funded entities, it has been difficult to enforce federal disability protections in medical decision-making. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
Don’t be too upset if your case hasn’t made it – there were some tough choices.1. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:38 pm by Scott Hervey
Don’t worry, we won’t take your ship! [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:41 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Among other things, this case has some interesting things to say about IIC and proper controls in survey cases.Alzheimer’s Disease & Related Disorders Association, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Judges also face pressures of time, and this is a time-consuming task. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Every time someone types a plaintiff's name into Google, the libels can pop up again. [read post]