Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 55,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2008, 11:06 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 9:05 am
In Lava v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:01 am
The issues presented by L.T.H. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 11:47 am
We have just learned that Arista v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
For the first time in the Court’s case-law, Macatė v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 12:54 am
People v Waggoner, 53 AD3d 1143). [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
Preserving sacred ground: Valuing culture in compensation for Indigenous Peoples. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:34 pm
Keefe v New York Law School [Appellate Division, First Department] [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 1:51 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 1:18 pm
(Actually, he overlooked military crimes, but those only applied to military and militia when in federal service, and were a kind of private law.)However, in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:53 pm
Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
Protecting traditional knowledge and Indigenous Peoples' rights: The key to developing international environmental laws that promote harmonious relationships with nature. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:49 am
One of the most famous and compelling defenses of the unitary executive comes from Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:05 pm
In his dissent in the Citizen United v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Judgement was also handed down on meaning in Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company v HarperCollins and Catherine Belthon [2021] EWHC 3141 (QB), the second libel claim to result from Putin’s People (above). [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:21 pm
In a judgment in the case of Bayev v Russia ([2017] ECHR 572) handed down on 20 June 2017, the Third Section of European Court of Human Rights found – by six votes to one – that the so-called Russian “gay-propaganda law” banning the promotion of homosexuality violated both Article 10 and Article 14 of the Convention. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 8:34 am
Rodriguez and Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
