Search for: "US v. CLARK "
Results 1601 - 1620
of 3,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2014, 8:15 am
The idea of using singer-songwriters as judges or contestants had been used before. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 1:05 am
After an astonishing gap of exactly eight months there was a dissent in the Court – two to be precise – by Lords Mance and Clarke in Willaims v The Central Bank of Nigeria [2014] UKSC 10. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Jacobsen v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:58 am
Nobody disputes the fact of that obligation, though the reality -- Consider US v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 1:00 am
This Atlantic article highlights Wolfe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:36 am
” Case citation: Clark v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Clarke (Ont. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Clark 13-555Issue: Whether a federal court has authority in extraordinary circumstances to bar a state from reprosecuting a defendant when state officials violate a federal habeas order and engage in continuing misconduct that substantially prejudices the defendant’s ability to secure a fair retrial. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
Question: You quote Justice Tom Clark as saying that the power of assigning opinions is perhaps a Chief Justice’s “single most influential function,” which he labeled as an exercise in “judicial-political discretion. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 8:30 am
”); Kimberly–Clark Corp. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
The leading case on false endorsement is Irvine v Talksport [2002] FSR 60, in which Eddie Irvine successfully argued passing off when Talksport used his image for an advertising campaign. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 10:36 am
AF v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 8:56 am
Clark International v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:05 am
Hospital Authority of Clarke County v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 9:50 am
In a recent case, Hospital Authority of Clarke County et al. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
In the early 1950s, the plaintiffs in the Brown v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:31 am
Core Issues Trust, R (On the Application of) v Transport for London & Another [2014] EWCA Civ 34 is a fascinating ruling of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales (Lord Dyson MR, Lord Justice Briggs and Lord Justice Christopher Clarke) since it isn't an intellectual property case at all, but has the potential to raise so many IP issues. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
It's rare, but it happened in this case.The case is U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
This modern “rational basis” review originated in the 1955 case of Williamson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:44 am
The case pitted the American Public Health Association v. [read post]
