Search for: "United Online Inc"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 4,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
United Tactical Systems v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:57 pm
Chrysler further alleges that proposed respondent Vehicles Online, Inc. sells infringing vehicles designated as “New 800cc Jeep,” which are likewise the same as the XYJK800 products manufactured by proposed respondent Xingyue Group Co., Ltd. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:21 am
And beyond this, Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
No two companies collect or use online information in the same manner. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
NFTs can link to any kind of digital media, including virtual fashion items that can be worn in virtual worlds online. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:14 am
Cray Inc., 2:15-CV-01554-JRG, (E.D. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 2:50 pm
Online access: http://resolve.library.ubc.ca/cgi-bin/catsearch? [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:31 am
Domains by Proxy, Inc. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 8:06 am
That is part of a set of principles designed to "offer a road map for unlocking the enormous potential of online video and user-generated content," Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger said in a statement issued by the participating companies.Some of the other companies involved are Viacom Inc, Walt Disney Co, Microsoft Corp, News Corp's Fox and MySpace units, CBS Corp, General Electric Co's NBC Universal, and… [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:03 pm
The South Dakota Challenge Seeking a judicial ruling on the constitutionality of the new Act, South Dakota filed suit in state court against three large online retailers with no physical presence in the state—Wayfair, Inc., Overstock, Inc., and Newegg, Inc. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 9:08 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus NEW PRIME INC. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:49 am
With this background, consider the following decision of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia (BC) in Equustek Solutions Inc. v Google Inc., 2015 BCCA 265, released on 15 June 2015. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
& Servs., Inc., 114 USPQ2d 1497, 1502 (TTAB 2015) (quoting Coach Servs., 101 USPQ2d at 1723-24). [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
Google Inc.[11]. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm
Jordan of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 12:18 pm
Wal-Mart argued that it couldn’t get addresses for those who purchased from its online store because the entity operating Wal-Mart.com—Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC—wasn’t the entity Duran sued, which was Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:28 am
The United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) is backing a group called Organization United for Respect at Walmart, or OUR Walmart, which is taking the protests online as well as to the streets. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:23 pm
I have written about the case of Google Inc vs Equustek Solutions several times over the past couple of years (for example, here, here, and here). [read post]
