Search for: "WAL-MART CORPORATION" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2008, 12:24 pm
One Wal-Mart store manager told me of a strategy that she used to minimize payroll costs: force out older workers who earned $9.50 an hour and replace them with new hires earning $6 an hour. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In other cases like Wal-Mart, the false positive issue has led the Court to more restrictive rules—but because the Court generally does want to hold out the prospect of some protection in such cases, the overall result of Sotomayor’s concurrence at least is consistent with Wal-Mart and Qualitex:you should have to show secondary meaning for your specific claimed mark and only then can you get trademark rights.] [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:47 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’ – motion… [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 11:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(The court mentions inherent distinctiveness but of course that’s not possible under Wal-Mart v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:28 am by Jon Gelman
http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/ Related articles Respirators Are Not Enough: New Study Examines Worker Exposure to Silica in Hydraulic Fracturing Operations (workers-compensation.blogspot.com) Workplace Deaths Substantially Unreported (workers-compensation.blogspot.com) OSHA's Distracted Driving Initiative (workers-compensation.blogspot.com) OSHA and NIOSH issue hazard alert on 1-bromopropane (workers-compensation.blogspot.com) Health Care Workers Suffer Exposures to Antineoplastic… [read post]
24 May 2013, 4:46 am by Jon Gelman
http://workers-compensation.blogspot.com/ Related articles Don't Fry Friday - May 24th California Study Reveals Occupational Asthma Is A Major Problem The International Call for Fashion Safety - Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh Buying a Cheap Shirt at Wal-Mart? [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:40 pm by Denis Stearns
  The law firm has brought Salmonella lawsuits against such companies as Cargill, ConAgra, Peanut Corporation of America, Sheetz, Taco Bell, Subway and Wal-Mart. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 10:01 am
“Theft is bad” Like many other corporate chains (Target and Wal-mart come to mind), Blockbuster must appear to despise shoplifting in all its shapes and forms, whilst doing pretty much nothing to stop it. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:21 am
Firm Sued for Cheating Lawyer Out of Profits After $172M Wal-Mart Win The Recorder Fred Furth won a $172 million award two years ago for Wal-Mart employees who weren't paid for meal breaks. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:36 pm by LindaMBeale
  Today the CEO of Wal-Mart earns nine hundred times the wages of his average employee. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 7:33 pm by Bill Marler
  The law firm has brought Salmonella lawsuits against such companies as Cargill, ConAgra, Peanut Corporation of America, Sheetz, Taco Bell, Subway and Wal-Mart. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
” It is apparent, at the close of this past Term, that the Roberts Court has not given up the temptation to which it yielded in in the school cases and the corporate campaign spending case. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 8:33 am
Last year, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. ran into trouble for taking out life insurance policies on employees. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
With an eye to the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v Dukes, the court determined that the plaintiffs could not show anything more than a uniform policy by Hearst of utilizing unpaid internships. [read post]