Search for: "WAL-MART CORPORATION" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by admin
Wal-Mart’s female employees sought to proceed in a class action to address corporate-wide wage disparities. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:06 pm
Wal-Mart does for--or perhaps we might better say Wal-Mart does to--Rule 23, what Twiqbal did for/to Rule 8. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:15 am by Genevieve P. Rapadas
Yesterday the Supreme Court of the United States issued its long-awaited opinion in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:04 am by admin
Like most companies, Wal-Mart’s corporate policy officially forbade discrimination. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:47 am by Charles C. Warner
Although Wal-Mart argued that plaintiffs could not meet all but the numerosity requirements, the court stated that "the crux of this case is commonality. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:37 am by Lisa Guerin
Yesterday, the Supreme Court gave employers a huge win in the case of Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:35 am by Adam Santucci
UPDATE: You may have heard the cheers emanating from Bentonville, Arkansas (the location of Wal-Mart's corporate headquarters), and the corporate headquarters of other large employers following the United States Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision in Wal-Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:33 am by Maine Employee Rights Group
Furthermore, during management training at Wal-Mart corporate headquarters, Wal-Mart told managers that the reason so few women have reached senior management at Wal-Mart was because men were "more aggressive" than women--an obviously stereotypical view of women in the workplace. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:28 am by sue.altmeyer@law.csuohio.edu
According to the court, the only corporate policy that the plaintiffs’ evidence convincingly showed was Wal-Mart’s policy of giving discretion to its local supervisors over employment matters. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:25 am by piperhoffman
Wal-Mart, the class action lawsuit accusing Wal-Mart of paying and promoting women less than similarly- or less-qualified men. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:30 am by Paul Caron
Linda Beale (Wayne State), WalMart, Gender Discrimination, Corporatism, the Supreme Court -- and, Yes, TAXES: The Supreme Court handed down its decision on whether the million and a half women who think they have been discriminated against by the corporate giant because of their gender can bring a class action... [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:07 am by Joey Fishkin
First, a big thank you to Jack for inviting me to contribute to the blog.The fulcrum of the 5-4 divide in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:50 pm
" Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor reports that "Supreme Court dismisses women's class action lawsuit against Wal-Mart; The Supreme Court decision, seen as a victory for Wal-Mart and corporate America, makes it more difficult for employees to join together in a common lawsuit unless they are able to identify a common injury. [read post]