Search for: "conn" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2015, 5:45 am
Bachelor, 237 Conn. 31, 46, 56, 675 A.2d 852 (1996), this court first recognized that, under certain limited circumstances, a bystander to an accident may bring a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress against the person whose negligence caused that accident, separate and apart from any claims that the primary victim of the accident might have. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 1:08 am by Jon Gelman
.), Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) and Elizabeth Esty (D-Conn.) have all signed onto bills repealing the powers of the Independent Payment Advisory Board, a panel created by the Affordable Care Act that will make recommendations on how to reduce Medicare spending once Medicare cost growth reaches a certain level. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:08 am
Salamon, 287 Conn. 509, 949 A.2d 1092 (2008); and (4) the trial court improperly precluded the testimony of two witnesses who would have corroborated his defense of extreme emotional disturbance. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 8:00 pm by Allan Blutstein
Conn.) -- ruling that FBI properly relied on Exemption 3, 6 and 7(C) to withhold wiretap surveillance tapes concerning criminal investigation of Bridgeport Mayor Joe Ganim. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 8:47 pm by Jon Gelman
Slotnik, 244 Conn. 781, 712 A.2d 396 (1998), cert. denied by Slotnik v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:07 am
Pringle, 255 Conn. 330, 354, 766 A.2d 400 (2001), holding that the trial court does not have subject matter jurisdiction in a case controlled by § 13a-149 if the plaintiff fails to provide sufficient notice to the defendant municipality. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:41 am
Golding, 213 Conn. 233; "He claims that (1) the court erred in rejecting his claim that his trial counsel was ineffective because of his failure to investigate the case properly and to present an alibi defense, and (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial and appellate counsel did not raise a double jeopardy claim. [read post]