Search for: "DOES 2-25" Results 1621 - 1640 of 16,505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2013, 7:24 pm
But what if it does happen, for example, if you get sued or garnished on a discharged debt? [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
On appeal to us, Appellants argue, for example, that Lee “explicitly disparage[s] pre-assembly of prior art plugs employing cylindrical sleeves as impractical and unworkable,” Reply Br. 7 (citing Lee at col. 1 ll. 12–27, col. 2 ll. 21–25), and that Lee therefore “teaches away from combining [pre-assembly] with a cylindrical device, the very type of device used by Rothstein and required in Appellants’ claims,” Reply Br. 8. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:00 am by John L. Welch
Coward refused registration under Section 2(d), deeming the marks confusingly similar to the registered marks BRIX for "restaurant and bar servies" and BRIXX for "restaurant services." [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This is significant with respect to the appointee's right to "notice and hearing" as a condition precedent to termination for cause and for other purposes set out in law.As a general rule, an individual appointed to a position on a permanent basis attains such status on the effective date of such "appointment" but [1] does not attain tenure in the position until he or she satisfactorily completes his or her maximum period of probation or [2] attains tenure… [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 8:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Shkipin operates an alternative agent-matching platform, HomeOpenly, that does not charge referral fees and instead obtains revenue from advertising and auxiliary services. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 4:42 am by John Day
This is a healthcare liability case with the central issues being (1) compliance with the notice provisions of the statute; and (2) the statute of limitations. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:25 am
She rejected arguments that the executive orders violated the Constitution, noting, “[t]he Supreme Court has ruled that a state does not commit a physical taking when it restricts the circumstances in which tenants may be evicted . . . [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:19 pm
Janssen, however, has said that birth defects involving Topamax users does not necessarily mean they were caused by the drug because oral clefts are common, impacting about 4,500 newborns each year. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:30 am by Jim Gerl
#bullyingHere is more from the court...these are not my words: 2. [read post]
6 May 2013, 8:01 am by Aaron Weems
  The adoptive couple’s appeal is based on two questions:   (1) Whether a non-custodial parent can invoke ICWA to block an adoption voluntarily and lawfully initiated by a non-Indian parent under state law, and; (2) Whether ICWA defines "parent" in 25 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:55 pm
Explicitly stating who you would like to take care of your children is important. 2. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:49 pm
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision in, Koontz v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 2:42 am
" The court explained that one "technically does not own a registration unless it is in force and effect. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 1:13 pm by Sean Hanover
The part about dad sponsoring him seems like a bit of a red herring at the moment, as there does not seem to be a basis for auto citizenship here. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:38 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
E.g., Appellant Br. 24–25,No. 18-1063 (citing 793 F.3d at 1326). [read post]