Search for: "Doe Nos." Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,061
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2010, 2:37 pm by Falk Metzler
Since the law rules out programs for computers as such from patent protection (§ 1 III Nos. 3, 4 PatG), the claimed teaching must, rather, contain instructions serving to solve a concrete technical problem by employing technical means. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 6,020,929 (the ‘929 patent), 6,305,016 (the ‘016 patent), and 6,701,523 (the ‘523 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”). [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:41 am by Durga Rao
(b) To set aside all MOUs, Power of Attorney, Agreements, etc. entered into by the respondents in relation to the sale and joint-development of land to an extent of 10 acres situated at G/F,Nos.23/1, 24/2, 25/2, G.S.No.23/2A and S/F No.22/1A, Chinnavedampatti Village, Coimbatore. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:11 pm by Randall Reese
" Rather, Riddell characterizes the motion as an attempt by Schutt to "gag Riddell in its communications to existing and potential customers of both Schutt and Riddell" and asserts that the automatic stay "does not prevent a debtor's competitor from attempting to sell its products in part by referring to [the potential consequences of a bankruptcy filing] in a light less flattering than the light chosen by the debtor in its press releases, court filings, and… [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:46 am by Kara OBrien
Release Nos. 33-9149, 34-63031, IC-29456 (October 4, 2010). [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:29 am by Schachtman
  Ultimately, evidence does not matter in debates about Creationism, and perhaps about other issues as well. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm by So
Aquí en blogylana regalamos un maravilloso formato de presupuesto que nos hizo Hluot. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm by So
Aquí en blogylana regalamos un maravilloso formato de presupuesto que nos hizo Hluot. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Moreover, the board notes that A 54(5) does not apply to the present patent (see point [3.1] above). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:18 am by David G. Badertscher
Chatt, KA 08-01135 Delay of 33 Years in Bringing Indictment Does Not Void Murder Convivtion, Panel FindsNEW YORK COUNTYContractsProcessor Granted Summary Judgment On Liability, Not Damages on Breach ClaimsTransFirst ePayment Services Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 11:43 pm by FDABlog HPM
Patent Nos. 5,985,864 (“the ’864 patent”); 6,140,321 (“the ’321 patent”); 6,245,911 (“the ’911 patent”), and 6,372,760 (“the ’760 patent”) (collectively the “DJ Patents”). [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 4:14 am by R. David Donoghue
 But even if your judge does not penalize you for failing to meet the courtesy copy requirements (and some will) if your motion or response is on a tight schedule you run the risk of not being fully heard. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm by Jason Rantanen
§ 287), because the claims covered a method and § 287 does not apply where the patent is directed to a process or method. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 8:20 am by Morris Turek
As you would expect, IHOP owns a number of federal trademark registrations for IHOP and INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES (Registration Nos. 2332311, 2942609, 3429406, 3429405, 3514724, 3408102, and 3507059), most of which are for restaurant services and food products. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:59 am by uwlegalscholarship
Pedrick Distinguished Research Scholar, Professor of Law, and Executive Director, Indian Legal Program, at Arizona State University School of Law, “The Future of Tribal Self-Determination: Does U.S. [read post]