Search for: "Doe v. State" Results 1621 - 1640 of 93,787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am by Shari Shapiro
 The EPA and its federal partners intend to discuss the development of appropriate EM&V protocols for such measures with states in the coming years. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The state certainly has a significant justification for imposing its tax on non-Indians, but at what point does the non-Indian vendor’s relationship with the Tribe impede the state’s right to tax? [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Laing J cites Lord Sumption’s definition of harassment in 2013: “Harassment is a persistent and deliberate course of unreasonable and oppressive conduct, targeted at another person, which is calculated to and does cause that person alarm, fear or distress: see Thomas v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2002] EMLR 78 , para 30 (Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR). [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:14 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
The latest in this series of cases is the judgment of the Andhra High Court in Muralidhar Rao v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 3:33 pm by Tom Smith
Stewart, who on Wednesday will make the state’s case to the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:20 am by Bridget Crawford
The Supreme Court of the United States will take up this question this term in the context of North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
And if so, does that mean that a state really could abolish marriage for everyone? [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am by Evangelina Cantu
’” That is how Chief Justice Mike McGrath referred to the Montana constitution’s provision that ensures the citizens of Montana the “right to a clean and healthful environment” and on which he grounded the majority’s opinion in his December 18, 2024,  holiday gift to the environment and the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: Washington State courts have jurisdiction over civil cases arising on Indian reservations as long as it does not infringe on the sovereignty of the tribe. [read post]