Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 1621 - 1640 of 9,565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
United States, 24 F.2d 665, 666-67 (9th Cir.1928) (holding that Rule 41(d), now Rule 41(f)(1)(C), does not invariably require that the copy of the warrant and receipt be served before a search takes place). [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 6:47 am
This Kat does not do well without sleep. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 11:36 am by Scott McKeown
  The district court granted Network-1’s motion, concluding that because of HP’s joinder to the Avaya IPR, HP should have been estopped under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 4:14 pm
(‘Amamiya' or RX-166) does not anticipate the asserted claims of the ‘751 patent under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 3:08 pm
Any funds in excess of that amount were taxed between 35-55%. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
 The fact that a word is complimentary or laudatory term does not necessarily mean it is devoid of distinctive character as long as it is capable of indicating commercial origin. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:57 pm
Patent Application No. 10/306,057 (“’057 Application”) for obviousness, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:37 am
That does not mean, however, that the price of a glass of beer can be regarded as a fee for viewing that broadcast and the establishment can be regarded as accessible to the public against payment of an entrance fee within the meaning of Article 13(d) of the Rome Convention. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:18 am by Dennis Crouch
And the Question: Does the prior publication count as prior art in an IPR obviousness analysis? [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
A complaint does not state a claim for relief where the well-pled facts fail to warrant an inference of any more than the mere possibility of misconduct. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:57 am by Dennis Crouch
In its petition, Mylan asks two questions: Does 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 11:59 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Maryland Vehicle Tint Darkness Regulations Window Allowed Tint Darkness Windshield Non-reflective 35% VLT tint on AS-1 line or top 5 inches Front Side windows Must allow more than 35% of light in Back Side windows Must allow more than 35% of light in Rear Window Must allow more than 35% of light in The Maryland Tint Law Here is the verbatim text of the statute §22–406: (a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings… [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 7:50 pm by Scott McKeown
Further, as noted by Petitioner, the ITC does not have the authority to invalidate a patent and ITC decisions do not necessarily pertain to the issues raised in an inter partes review petition . . . [read post]