Search for: "Does 1-71"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 2,540
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2013, 6:04 pm
What does "materially aid" mean? [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Also, in its version in force as of September 1, 1987, R 51 EPC 19 [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm
Weissman’s support for Proposition 71 constitutes a conflict of interest. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The language of FCA § 413(1)(c)(7) does not command any formula with respect to apportionment of private school tuition (to the same effect, see D.R.L. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm
(Doc. 71, pg. 10; Doc. 71–1, pgs. 35 & 52.) [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
In re Ochiai, 71 F.3d 1565, 1572 (Fed. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 11:00 am
How does the ratio of arrests to dismissals compare to those other jurisdictions? [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
The Government does not intend any further statutory extension of their availability. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 8:19 am
Accordingly, rights of first refusal over land can be protected by registration under s. 71(1). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Does that tell you – a light bulb doesn’t go off in your head and say, This is a drug deal? [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
”[1.2] In the present case the Examining Division (ED) consisted of Examiners A, B and C (C being the chairman) when it issued the communication pursuant to R 71(3) (intention to grant, see EPO form 2035.4 (sheet 1) dated April 16, 2008, as well as EPO form 2004, sheet R, dated May 21, 2008). [read post]
15 Dec 2012, 4:49 pm
What exactly does section 383-c accomplish regarding adoption of children? [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
Like Section 64.1 of the Copyright Act in respect of copyright law, Section 5.1 of the IDA provides that goes on to ensure that a registered industrial design does not protect useful features of a work. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 5:55 pm
Despite popular opinion, that saying does not belong to Twain but to English evangelist Charles Haddon Spurgeon who said it during a sermon on April 1, 1855. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
The CJEU in the reference -- Boehringer Ingelheim KG v Swingward Ltd [2007] ETMR 71 (Boehringer II) --did not follow the Advocate General's opinion. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:53 am
In that case, the husband was a 71 % shareholder in two companies; the remainder was owned by unconnected business associates. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am
Ning, 997 So.2d 567, 570-71 (La. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
We hold that a party's failure to disclose its experts pursuant to CPLR 3101(d)(1)(i) prior to the filing of a note of issue and certificate of readiness does not divest a court of the discretion to consider an affirmation or affidavit submitted by that party's experts in the context of a timely motion for summary judgment. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:33 am
(at p. 71). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:59 am
TABLE 1: SUPREME COURT REVERSALS OF LOWER COURT DECISIONS BY TERM AND CIRCUIT (2005 – 2011) 1. [read post]
