Search for: "Does 1-96"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 2,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2011, 6:26 pm
” Restatement, § 96 (1)(a) (emphasis added). [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 5 bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the authorities in the Requested State have decided not to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings against the person sought. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:04 am
See Romano, supra, 96 N.J. at 80. . . . [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Luxembourg International Extradition Treaty with the United States October 1, 1996, Date-Signed February 1, 2002, Date-In-Force Status: July 8, 1997. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:23 am
Super. 91, 96 (App. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:23 am
Super. 91, 96 (App. [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:07 am
Ct. 510, 1 L. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm
Mindful of this principle, we decline the plaintiffs’ invitation to predict that the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals would adopt the specific provisions of the Restatement advanced by the plaintiffs.Id. at 96 (citing Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 4(1) states generally that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:00 am
The discharge of the person sought from custody pursuant to this Article explicitly does not prejudice subsequent rearrest and extradition upon later delivery of the extradition request and supporting documents. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE II Extraditable Offenses 1. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:01 pm
The European search report contained an objection pursuant to A 84 together with R 29(2) EPC 1973.In it’s communication pursuant to A 96(2) EPC 1973 dated October 16, 2007, the ED referred to the written opinion of the search report and invited the applicant to amend the application so as to overcome the objection.In its response dated April 25, 2008, the applicant filed an amended set of claims containing two independent claims, wherein one of which was a limited version of claim… [read post]
7 May 2011, 11:01 am
[8.1] Since D14 does not even address the same problem as the patent in suit, the skilled person seeking to provide a process for the production of a polyamide prepolymer would have no reason even to consult D14. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 6 bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute or have decided to discontinue criminal proceedings against the person sought. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
The discharge of the person sought from custody pursuant to this Article explicitly does not prejudice subsequent rearrest and extradition upon later delivery of the extradition [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:35 am
Super. 86, 96-97 (App. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 5 Prior Prosecution 1. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:26 am
(2) Copyright in a work is infringed by a person who without the licence of the copyright owner does, or authorises another to do, any of the acts restricted by the copyright [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
This harmless misstatement does not rescue the relevant claims from a best mode violation. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
§ 112 ¶ 1. [read post]
