Search for: "Fund of Funds, Limited v. First American Fund of Funds" Results 1621 - 1640 of 2,465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
EME Homer City Generation and American Lung Association v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:42 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The reason major national banks choose South Dakota is the favorable legal climate there: No limits on interest rates that may be contracted for. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm by Lowell Brown
Once upon a time, if you mentioned the topics of “social media” and “contract clauses” in the same sentence to entertainment industry big shots, they would associate it with a way to limit entertainers from discussing their projects on Facebook, Twitter, and other social networking platforms. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I wanted to pass along another brief the UCLA First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic submitted last week. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Ruling Heard ‘Round the Country: Baehr v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 9:07 am by Veronika Gaertner
 Jan von Hein: “The applicability of Art. 5 No. 3 Brussels I-Regulation to damages caused by multiple tortfeasors”  In Melzer v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:09 am by David S. Kemp
The Facts and Arguments of United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 7:00 am by Faiza Patel
American lawyers have it drummed into our heads that “hard cases make bad law. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 6:15 am by Schachtman
In a recent post, Celeste Monforton, of George Washington University School of Public Health & Health Services, wrote about conflicts of interest and the recent Georgia-Pacific decision out of the First Department of the New York Appellate Division, Weitz & Luxenberg P.C. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  They first protested to the town board, and then decided to hire a lawyer — first, to question the board about the practice, and then to file a lawsuit. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That bad, judge-created exception to the Fourth Amendment from the 1970s (Smith v. [read post]
Kirtsaeng, which affirmed owners' first-sale rights to lend or resell products and works manufactured abroad. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:11 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
The American Association of University Professors recently issued a draft report, seeking comment, on the topic “Defending the Freedom to Innovate: Faculty Intellectual Property (IP) Rights After Stanford v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The Justice Department’s analysis states that since the Supreme Court’s 1910 ruling in Hass v Henkel and its 1924 ruling in Hammererschmidt v. [read post]